All-Party Parliamentary Group for Future Generations
Formation | 2018; 6 years ago (2018) |
---|---|
Type | All-party parliamentary group |
Chair | Bambos Charalambous |
Affiliations | Centre for the Study of Existential Risk |
Website | www |
The All-Party Parliamentary Group for Future Generations is an informal cross-party group with the parliament of the United Kingdom.[1] Its role is to raise the profile of long-term issues, protect the interests of future generations, and provide a forum for discussion about ways to reduce short-termism in politics and policy making.
The group officially launched in 2018, with the assistance of Martin Rees,[2] a member of the House of Lords, who has written extensively on the future of humanity and the potential dangers humanity might face.[3]
The group's secretariat is the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk at Cambridge University.[4]
Officers
Role | Name | Party |
---|---|---|
Chair & Registered Contact | Bambos Charalambous | Labour |
Co-Chair | Lord Bird | Crossbench |
Officer | Anna McMorrin | Labour |
Officer | Daniel Zeichner | Labour |
Officer | Richard Balfe | Conservative |
Officer | Toby Harris | Labour |
Officer | Lord Rees | Crossbench |
Officer | Mary Watkins | Crossbench |
Officer | Liz Saville Roberts | Plaid Cymru |
Officer | Usha Prashar | Crossbench |
Officer | Michael Hastings | Crossbench |
Officer | Caroline Lucas | Green Party |
Officer | Simon Fell | Conservative |
References
- ^ a b "House of Commons - Register Of All-Party Parliamentary Groups as at 24 February 2020: Future Generations". publications.parliament.uk. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ^ Krznaric, Roman. "Why we need to reinvent democracy for the long-term". www.bbc.com. Retrieved 7 July 2019.
- ^ Rees, Martin J. (16 October 2018). On the future : prospects for humanity. Princeton, New Jersey. ISBN 9780691180441. OCLC 1028209978.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ "CSER supports new APPG". www.cser.ac.uk. Retrieved 16 January 2019.
External links
- Official website
- v
- t
- e
- Aid effectiveness
- Charity assessment
- Demandingness objection
- Disability-adjusted life year
- Disease burden
- Distributional cost-effectiveness analysis
- Earning to give
- Equal consideration of interests
- Longtermism
- Marginal utility
- Moral circle expansion
- Psychological barriers to effective altruism
- Quality-adjusted life year
- Utilitarianism
- Venture philanthropy
- 80,000 Hours
- Against Malaria Foundation
- All-Party Parliamentary Group for Future Generations
- Animal Charity Evaluators
- Animal Ethics
- Centre for Effective Altruism
- Centre for Enabling EA Learning & Research
- Center for High Impact Philanthropy
- Centre for the Study of Existential Risk
- Development Media International
- Evidence Action
- Faunalytics
- Fistula Foundation
- Future of Humanity Institute
- Future of Life Institute
- Founders Pledge
- GiveDirectly
- GiveWell
- Giving What We Can
- Good Food Fund
- The Good Food Institute
- Good Ventures
- The Humane League
- Mercy for Animals
- Machine Intelligence Research Institute
- Malaria Consortium
- Nuclear Threat Initiative
- Open Philanthropy
- Raising for Effective Giving
- Sentience Institute
- Unlimit Health
- Wild Animal Initiative
- Biotechnology risk
- Climate change
- Cultured meat
- Economic stability
- Existential risk from artificial general intelligence
- Global catastrophic risk
- Global health
- Global poverty
- Immigration reform
- Intensive animal farming
- Land use reform
- Life extension
- Malaria prevention
- Mass deworming
- Neglected tropical diseases
- Suffering risks
- Wild animal suffering
- Doing Good Better
- The End of Animal Farming
- Famine, Affluence, and Morality
- The Life You Can Save
- Living High and Letting Die
- The Most Good You Can Do
- Practical Ethics
- The Precipice
- Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies
- What We Owe the Future
This article related to the politics of the United Kingdom, or its predecessor or constituent states, is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
- v
- t
- e